The European powers also introduced the system in each of their respective colonies, and by the 20th century, it had touched every corner of the world. This currency system where a unit is made up of sub-units contrasts the older British system of pence-shilling-pound and is seen as a much-simplified currency system.
Several prominent Americans such as Thomas Jefferson and Graham Bell were particularly vocal in their desire to have the metric system universally used in the United States, stating that the American system involved complex arithmetic. The metric system was first introduced in Paris, France, in the late 18th century. The Metric System. Learning Objective s. In the United States, both the U. In most other countries, the metric system is the primary system of measurement.
If you travel to other countries, you will see that road signs list distances in kilometers and milk is sold in liters.
These measurement units are part of the metric system. Unlike the U. For example, a liter is 10 times larger than a deciliter, and a centigram is 10 times larger than a milligram. So, what if you have to find out how many milligrams are in a decigram? Or, what if you want to convert meters to kilometers? Understanding how the metric system works is a good start.
What is Metric? The metric system uses units such as meter , liter , and gram to measure length, liquid volume, and mass, just as the U. In addition to the difference in the basic units, the metric system is based on 10s, and different measures for length include kilometer, meter, decimeter, centimeter, and millimeter. The metric system also applies the idea that units within the system get larger or smaller by a power of This means that a meter is times larger than a centimeter, and a kilogram is 1, times heavier than a gram.
You will explore this idea a bit later. Length, Mass, and Volume. The table below shows the basic units of the metric system.
Note that the names of all metric units follow from these three basic units. In the metric system, the basic unit of length is the meter. A meter is slightly larger than a yardstick, or just over three feet. The basic metric unit of mass is the gram. A regular-sized paperclip has a mass of about 1 gram. Among scientists, one gram is defined as the mass of water that would fill a 1-centimeter cube.
The standard it represented was to be constructed so as to equal a fraction of the distance from the North Pole to the equator. Indicative of the difficulties surround adoption of the new system, a survey team charged with measuring the arc of the earth aroused such suspicion that they were harassed and even jailed by local officials as they went about their work.
Napoleon himself would even ban the system before it was officially adopted by the French government. The U. Congress declared the system lawful in commerce throughout the nation in Twenty years earlier, the French made use of the system compulsory.
In the period of to , there was a strong movement in the United States toward widespread use of the metric system. That initiative lost momentum, and the nation continues to use a dual system of measurement even though the system is now employed widely throughout the world. There is a strong likelihood that the United States will eventually yield to international pressure to produce and label U. I know that metric measures are useful and more precise, but they are of no use to me.
I was a child during the push to switch over to Metric and I can say one of the biggest mistakes was why the emphasis on converting back and forth!
Fortunately, my time card in the military Metric is widely used and once I realized that if it is in Metric there's no need to convert! Also, I did a lot of traveling, abroad so the Metric System is natural to me. I use it whenever possible. I'm actually embarrassed that we are so slow with the changing, most people abroad look at us like we're idiots. At least I know the younger generations are being taught Metric properly,and most agree we should be using it. It's past time, and it's mainly the baby boomer generation that refuse to adapt, to change.
Nice try but the vast majority of Americans have no clue on metric. For example, they don't even know how far a kilometer is compared with a mile. Interestingly, the British still officially use miles for road signs. Stones and pounds for a person's weight, and feet and inches for a person's height, are only used in everyday parlance among older generations.
Although Canada adopted SI on April 1, to some hatdcore Canadians this was indeed a joke we still use Imperial measures widely, in fact exclusively in construction and plumbing. In western Canada temperatures are still announced in F and C in medias. Elders tend to state distances in miles although our maps and traffic signs are exclusively metric. Yes, the myth that US does not use metric system is really stupid. But this is still true that only US, Liberia and Myanmar in the whole world use only or mostly imperial system.
And the fact that US was one of the original countries to sign the Metre Convention, only makes it look worse.
Yanno, the real question I have is why does anyone care? If it is such an inconvenience, feel free to live somewhere else. Literally, almost anywhere else Using the current customs of the rest of the world as some sort of guiding principal is as logically empty as admonishing a holdout for refusing to use leeches for headaches in the dark ages.
Lets be honest, even many of the SI units are fundamentally meaningless. How many times has the Meter changed? The gram? Lets look no further than a article from Physics World:. The changes will now come into force on 20 May The point is, enough is enough. The condescending stream of preaching about the United State's refusal to adopt the metric system has grown dull.
You want to know why the US doesn't use the metric system? Its arbitrary, just like the Imperial system. The metric system has at least given us a framework for how to base an entire measurement system off of a pointless, arbitrary creation like the meter.
Now lets build one that is actually universal. Dare I say one that is based off of something substantial, apparently universal, and easily attainable, like the hydrogen atom? Then perhaps the electron? At least it would be something fundamental to the cosmos, as opposed to some arbitrary construct which has had to be redefined half a dozen times in the last years.
Make a meaningful system with true foresight and longevity, we will gladly change. Continue to argue for swapping out one arbitrary system for another simply because "everyone is doing it" and its easier to multiply? Moving on Oh, and since base 12 mathematics are apparently too hard for anyone outside of the U. I would hate to make anyone resort to using elementary school multiplication after all.
No, the lenght didn't change, only the definitions and protocoles were improved for additional rigour. Seriously, in the era of micro-processors and nanotechnologies, do you really think it's still consistent to use primitive measures as the finger of someone, its foot or a random stone? There is a lenght unit now carrefully defined and based on the most precise way humanity was able for the metre speed of light and one for the mass based on water at sea level of a cubic tenth of that lenght, the whole metric system is named by comprehensive terms and logically dividable with the base the world decided to use whether 12 might have been better without having to do multiple conversions and used everywhere.
Long story short, imperial is not compatible even with itself. If you're happy with that, good for you but I and many others want better than mediocrity for our country! The US is already metric; and will eventually become fully metric.
The problem is that it is not happening fast enough. NIST needs to push harder. The new generations are not recalcitrant like previous generations, and will indeed accept the new system. We just need to educate. The meter is an arbitrary unit of measure that is subdivided by the number of digits on our hands.
There is nothing 'better' about that. If we had three fingers and a thumb, then you would be talking about how wonderful the base-8 system is and, you know what, it WOULD be better than base because there would be no rounding errors in computer programs.
The worse excuse I've ever heard from an engineer, who should have known better, was to talk about how we should go metric because computers use it. Computers are constantly having to convert as best as they can from base-2 to base In the English system, you use base-2 because it is practical. YES, fractional inches are in base-2, the most efficient system possible - the reason computers use it!
It would be nonsense to go through the trouble of trying to make base "bits" because WE have 10 digits, computers should, too??
Using base-2, you only have the sizes that are practical as size increases. You can see this most easily in a mechanic's toolbox. In the range of normally encountered automotive sockets, I have 15 English sockets and 24 Metric sockets. That's what happens when you use an arbitrary base system. On a private level, I tried years ago to go to the Meter. It was terrible. When you are using the inch, you subdivide by base-2 units i. You want to place a screw in the center of an inch-based board?
Divide by 2. When I wanted to place a screw at the center of cm based board, I had to go to mm to divide by 2! I also have to say something about the commentor who claimed that time is in the metric system: Were you even serious? Time units, from day to second, are Base24, Base60, Base The same goes for circular measure, there are degrees because it is so practical.
Try metric on that. I think that I might have missed your point, but even if we measure with fractional inches in base2, we are still using the numeric system in base Did you mean to criticize the metric system or the usage of a numeric system in base10? Because the former is just a consequence to the latter. Of course there would be no point of a decimal metric system if we used a base 8 system.
0コメント